Aristotle on friendship

This is precisely what a strong form of egoism cannot accept. Sometimes only a small degree of anger is appropriate; but at other times, circumstances call for great anger.

aristotle friendship of the good

When there is too great a gap between people, friendship is impossible, and often two friends will grow apart if one becomes far more virtuous than the other. Aristotle does not mean to suggest that unequal relations based on the mutual recognition of good character are defective in these same ways.

I think so. The exact time of his departure from The Academy is disputed, but it's said that he left soon after Plato died due to his dislike of the direction that it subsequently took. But Aristotle is not looking for a defense of this sort, because he conceives of friendship as lying primarily in activity rather than receptivity.

The pleasure of drawing, for example, requires both the development of drawing ability and an object of attention that is worth drawing. True friends are friends because they care about the same thing: goodness.

The imperfect friendships that Aristotle focuses on, however, are not unequal relationships based on good character. Has he not already told us that there can be no complete theoretical guide to ethics, that the best one can hope for is that in particular situations one's ethical habits and practical wisdom will help one determine what to do?

Aristotle on friendship summary

If, for example, one is trying to decide how much to spend on a wedding present, one is looking for an amount that is neither excessive nor deficient. Here he is influenced by an idea expressed in the opening line of the Ethics: the good is that at which all things aim. For he thinks that this kind of friendship can exist only when one spends a great deal of time with the other person, participating in joint activities and engaging in mutually beneficial behavior; and one cannot cooperate on these close terms with every member of the political community. Plants and non-human animals seek to reproduce themselves because that is their way of participating in an unending series, and this is the closest they can come to the ceaseless thinking of the unmoved mover. To show that A deserves to be our ultimate end, one must show that all other goods are best thought of as instruments that promote A in some way or other. Aristotle does not mean to suggest that unequal relations based on the mutual recognition of good character are defective in these same ways. So the general explanation for the occurrence of akrasia cannot be that the strength of a passion overwhelms reason. Consider someone who loves to wrestle, for example.
Rated 5/10 based on 97 review
Download
3 Types of Friendship, According to Aristotle